This collection of resources is meant to support faculty who are interested in learning more about and responding to generative artificial intelligence (AI) technology in the classroom.
We are happy to add additional resources here and would love your feedback. Please email any comments or suggestions to Dr. Lauren Mitchell (lnahas@santarosa.edu), the Instructional Designer for the Office of Distance Education.
This YouTube playlist is a great place to start. The Mollicks are considered two of the key voices on AI and higher ed.
A Very Gentle Introduction to Large Language Models without the Hype, Medium — In-depth (but reasonably short) definitions of key AI terminology for folks without a Computer Science background. Plus, helpful visuals. Covers large language models, machine learning, neural networks, etc.
In-Depth Training and Professional Development
Generative AI in the Classroom, California Virtual Campus (@ONE) — @ONE offers this both as a 2-week self-paced course and a more in-depth 4-week facilitated version.
Artificial Intelligence Teaching Guide, Stanford University — This single-module course helps you think through the implications of AI for your course, create an AI course policy, and consider how you might incorporate AI into your course.
Generative AI Prompt Literacy, University of Michigan-Flint — This course provides both a basic introduction to AI and strategies to write effective prompts to make the most of these tools. The course also covers ethical issues and bias in AI.
AI for Learning: Integrating Artificial Intelligence Into Your Teaching, Carnegie Mellon University and College of the Canyons — This course covers the full design loop of integrating Artificial Intelligence into your teaching and higher‑education classrooms, from foundational concepts to real‑world application.
In the short-term, we recommend that you develop an AI policy for your courses. This is the key to communicating clearly with students. Once the policy is established, we recommend that you talk with your students about the policy and about AI in general. Finally, if you have a conditional, restricted or closed AI policy, consider taking measures to secure your assessments. Use the resources below to get support and view examples of each of these steps.
To demonstrate your commitment to academic integrity and that you value clear communication with your students on this issue, it can be helpful to take the time to talk to students about your AI policy. This is also an opportunity to clarify to students how AI impacts the integrity of the course's learning goals. Consider the following activities:
Survey Students about AI. Make the anonymous results public so that students can see how their peers are using and thinking about AI.
Take class time to review the course's AI policy and explain your reasoning behind the policy. Consider this annotation and discussion approach, using SRJC's social annotation tool Hypothes.is.
Have students evaluate whether or not the use of genAI is appropriate in the course for various assessments. Then discuss as a class to come to a consensus. Worksheet: Reflection Sheet for Student Use of AI.
If your Syllabus policy states that AI use is Closed, Conditional, or Restricted, consider taking steps to secure your assessments. Your students are human and the temptation of AI is strong, especially for students who are unsure of their academic skills. There are various ways to discourage inappropriate use, ranging from using Canvas settings to online proctoring tools.
Canvas Features - Learn how to set up your quizzes to discourage academic dishonesty.
Zoom Proctoring - Use this guidance to help you prepare to proctor an exam via Zoom.
Turnitin's AI Checker - SRJC currently (spring 25) has a license for Turnitin's AI detection tool. While, these tools have been found to produce false-positives, they can provide you with useful information if you suspect a student is using AI inappropriately. The consensus on these types of tools is that they should not be relied upon as the only form of evidence of academic dishonestly.
The following resources will help you get started with Turnitin's AI detection tool:
Addressing Artificial Intelligence, Washington University in St. Louis - This provides some ideas on how to use AI detection tool results effectively.
Remote Proctoring with Proctorio. SRJC currently has a license with Proctorio. Proctorio enables instructors to use the Lock-Down Browser or Live Proctoring options to increase assessment security.
Instructors who decide to use Proctoring software should take the following steps to communicate with students and ease anxiety around proctoring and exams:
Let students know that proctoring software will be used at the beginning of the course.
Create a practice experience with the proctoring tool so that students can make sure that their computer is properly set up to take the test.
Inform students about how to get help if they need it during the proctored exam, and link directly to where they can access that support from the assignment.
To get started with Proctorio, enable Secure Exam Proctor in the course navigation via the Settings area in Canvas. Then follow the instructions in the Proctorio quickstart guide.
Long-Term Strategies
Simply banning genAI use and using detection tools are unsustainable responses to AI misuse. Because of this, student learning outcomes, assessments and/or grading methods may need some rethinking and revision.
It's important to acknowledge that these types of changes are not simple and can be time-consuming. However, the investment now will save on the time and energy put into AI detection in the long run. In addition, many of these changes can be transformative for your classroom and your students. Explore the resources below and think about which ones make the most sense for you, are the most reasonable for you to execute, and will most benefit your students and classroom.
In light of AI, assessments may need to be altered to (1) shift towards a focus on process rather than product, (2) provide students with more authentic scenarios for demonstrating their knowledge (and thus increasing intrinsic motivation), and, in some cases, (3) incorporate the use of AI as appropriate to the discipline.
Assessment Ideas Factory, University of Queensland — This is a database of assessment ideas to help with brainstorming.
AI Pedagogy Project, Harvard University — This site provides a showcase of assessment ideas that incorporate AI from a variety of disciplines.
Specific Strategies
Assessment Transparency — Increasing the transparency of your assessments—i.e., being specific about the purpose, directions and grading criteria—has been shown to improve student success and increase intrinsic motivation.
Canvas Discussion Redesign (watch the two 1/2 hour workshops below) — Asynchronous discussions have proven difficult to AI-proof. Instead, focus on increasing intrinsic motivation for participating in discussions by making these assignments more meaningful and valuable to students.
As we all know, students have learned to highly value the grade at the end of the semester. This is also one of the reasons why inappropriate use of AI is so tempting. Consider shifting you grading system to help your students focus more on learning.
The Learning Record, University of Texas, Austin — An evidence-based, metacognitive grading system.
Generative AI in the Classroom, California Virtual Campus (@ONE) — @ONE offers this both as a 2-week self-paced course and a more in-depth 4-week facilitated version.
The strategies below are based on the presentation, "The Opposite of Cheating: Teaching with Integrity in the Age AI," by Tricia Bertram-Gallant, Director of the Academic Integrity Office at UC San Diego.